• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Chr. Michelsens Institutt
  • Publications
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Chr. Michelsens Institutt
  • Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Monitoring judicial integrity: Lessons for implementation of UNCAC Article 11

Armytage, Livingston
Research report
Thumbnail
View/Open
Monitoring judicial integrity: Lessons for implementation of UNCAC Article 11 (387.8Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474585
Date
2009-10-15
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Publications [1324]
Original version
Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Issue 2009:12) 29 p.  
Abstract
This U4 Issue Paper translates lessons related to monitoring judicial reform to the specific requirements of UNCAC Article 11. Taking the Paris Declaration’s requirement to monitor for development results as a starting point, it asks what this might mean with respect to measures aimed at increasing integrity and reducing corruption. The need to clarify what to monitor, who to monitor, at what cost, and for what purpose, is elaborated. The paper also highlights the links between effective monitoring and an appropriate selection of indicators, capacity for data collection and analysis, and a feedback mechanism to support ongoing evaluation and fine‑tuning of the reform process.
Publisher
Chr. Michelsen Institute
Series
U4 Issue 2009:12

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit