Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorArmytage, Livingston
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:16:06Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:16:06Z
dc.date.issued2009-10-15
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:3483
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Issue 2009:12) 29 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474585
dc.description.abstractThis U4 Issue Paper translates lessons related to monitoring judicial reform to the specific requirements of UNCAC Article 11. Taking the Paris Declaration’s requirement to monitor for development results as a starting point, it asks what this might mean with respect to measures aimed at increasing integrity and reducing corruption. The need to clarify what to monitor, who to monitor, at what cost, and for what purpose, is elaborated. The paper also highlights the links between effective monitoring and an appropriate selection of indicators, capacity for data collection and analysis, and a feedback mechanism to support ongoing evaluation and fine‑tuning of the reform process.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Issue
dc.relation2009:12
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Issue
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Issue 2009:12
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/3483-monitoring-judicial-integrity
dc.subjectJustice
dc.subjectUncac
dc.subjectJudicial Corruption
dc.titleMonitoring judicial integrity: Lessons for implementation of UNCAC Article 11
dc.typeResearch report


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel