Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorde Vibe, Maja
dc.contributor.authorTaxell, Nils
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:19:02Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-25
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5097
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2014:4) 4 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474943
dc.description.abstractIn 2006, the OECD Development Assistance Committee Ministers of Development expressed a desire to move towards more effective collective responses to corruption. However, donors have continued to struggle with responding robustly to corruption cases. Donors cannot afford to continue to respond in a haphazard, inconsistent, and poorly planned fashion. Attention should be invested into how to respond to corruption cases in a manner that has a strategic focus beyond getting the money back. This means preparing a coordinated response; acting consistently and predictably; and maintaining a dialogue with multiple partners including non-state actors.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2014:4
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2014:4
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5097-collective-donor-responses-barking-or-biting
dc.subjectAid
dc.titleCollective donor responses: Barking or biting?
dc.typeReport


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel