• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Chr. Michelsens Institutt
  • Publications
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Chr. Michelsens Institutt
  • Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Collective donor responses: Barking or biting?

de Vibe, Maja; Taxell, Nils
Report
Thumbnail
View/Open
Collective donor responses: Barking or biting? (717.7Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474943
Date
2014-03-25
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Publications [1177]
Original version
Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2014:4) 4 p.  
Abstract
In 2006, the OECD Development Assistance Committee Ministers of Development expressed a desire to move towards more effective collective responses to corruption. However, donors have continued to struggle with responding robustly to corruption cases. Donors cannot afford to continue to respond in a haphazard, inconsistent, and poorly planned fashion. Attention should be invested into how to respond to corruption cases in a manner that has a strategic focus beyond getting the money back. This means preparing a coordinated response; acting consistently and predictably; and maintaining a dialogue with multiple partners including non-state actors.
Publisher
Chr. Michelsen Institute
Series
U4 Brief 2014:4

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit