Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlackmore, Sansia
dc.contributor.authorFjeldstad, Odd-Helge
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-27T17:37:13Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:9539
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI Insight 2025:03) 6 p.
dc.identifier.issn0809-6732
dc.identifier.issn0809-6732
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3185442
dc.description.abstractIntroduction A common policy concern in developing countries is that inadequate government revenue hampers development. Hence, many countries focus on raising revenue through taxation, assuming governance improvements will follow because taxpayers will demand something in return for their tax payments, i.e. constituting a “fiscal social contract” between taxpayers and the government. Post-Apartheid South Africa has achieved remarkable success in revenue collection. However, despite high tax collection, governance and social indicators have declined. This policy insight explores three possible reasons why a fiscal social contract has not materialized in South Africa. We argue that (1) excessive coercion by the revenue administration undermines voluntary tax compliance; (2) fiscal bargaining is unlikely in a highly unequal society relying on a very narrow base; and (3) unlike in transactional settings, norms-driven societies require different triggers for fiscal accountability.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationCMI Insight
dc.relation2025:03
dc.relation.ispartofCMI Insight
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Insight 2025:03
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Insight 2025:03
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/9539-an-elusive-fiscal-social-contract-three-lessons-from-south-africa
dc.subjectTaxation
dc.subjectFiscal Social Contract
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.titleAn Elusive Fiscal Social Contract: Three Lessons from South Africa
dc.typeReport


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record