Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorForster, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-27T17:37:12Z
dc.date.available2024-11-27T17:37:12Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:9419
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Issue 2024:8) 46 p.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3166951
dc.description.abstractDespite the vital role of anti-corruption in sustaining peace, the scope and success of integrating anti-corruption provisions in peace agreements has never been examined. Our study finds that, in the last 34 years, anti-corruption provisions appeared in 36% of peace processes. The terms are stronger in substantive peace agreements, and less robust in pre-negotiation, ceasefire, or renewal arrangements. Anti-corruption advocates will achieve the best results by targeting a range of negotiation channels.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Issue
dc.relation2024:8
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Issue
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Issue 2024:8
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/9419-anti-corruption-in-peacebuilding-practice
dc.subjectAnti-Corruption
dc.subjectPeace Agreements
dc.subjectYemen
dc.subjectSomalia
dc.subjectSudan
dc.subjectSouth Sudan
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectColombia
dc.subjectNepal
dc.subjectSri Lanka
dc.titleAnti-corruption in peacebuilding practice
dc.typeResearch report


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record