Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSjursen, Ingrid Hoem
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T17:37:18Z
dc.date.available2024-02-09T17:37:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:9123
dc.identifier.citationin Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization vol. 216 pp. 386-432
dc.identifier.issn0167-2681
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3116671
dc.description.abstractThe Rentier State Hypothesis states that taxation promotes government accountability. The argument is that citizens demand more accountability for spending of tax revenue than for spending of windfall revenue (e.g., natural resource revenue and aid). This paper presents causal evidence from a between-subject experiment that tests the effect of taxation on demand for accountability. To investigate the underlying mechanisms of the effect, the design focuses on two main features that distinguish tax from windfall revenue: Tax revenue is produced by citizens’ work and has been in their possession before it is collected as tax. The main finding is that taxation causes a higher demand for accountability when both features of taxation are present, consistent with the Rentier State Hypothesis. The paper sheds light on the political economy of government revenues, and contributes to our understanding of how features of the tax system shape behavior.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relationJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization vol. 216
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/9123-accountability-and-taxation-experimental-evidence
dc.titleAccountability and taxation: Experimental evidence
dc.typeJournal article
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.identifier.cristin2193763


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel