Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWang, Vibeke
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Mi Yung
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-09T14:00:45Z
dc.date.available2018-05-09T14:00:45Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:6512
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI Brief no. 2) 4 p.
dc.identifier.issn0809-6732
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2497842
dc.description.abstractReserved-seat quotas have been used worldwide as a measure to get more women in parliament. However, they are meant to be temporary until women can compete with men for open seats using their quota experience. The cases of Tanzania and Uganda show that the reserved-seat design is a crucial factor in enabling quota MPs to make switches from quota- to non-quota seats. We find that the Tanzanian model is superior to the Ugandan model in facilitating switches. This CMI Brief is based on the article “Recruitment Mechanisms for Reserved Seats for Women in Parliament and Switches to Non-Quota Seats: A Comparative Study of Tanzania and Uganda” accepted for publication in Journal of Modern African Studies December 2017.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationCMI Brief
dc.relation2018:2
dc.relation.ispartofCMI Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Brief no. 2
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Brief vol. 17 no. 2018:2
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/6512-switches-from-quota-to-non-quota-seats
dc.subjectQuota- to Non-Quota Seats
dc.subjectWomen in Parliament
dc.subjectTanzania
dc.subjectUganda
dc.titleSwitches from quota- to non-quota seats: A comparative study of Tanzania and Uganda
dc.typeReport


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel