Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSieder, Rachel
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:23:49Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:23:49Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:6388
dc.identifier.citationin NYU Journal of International Law and Politics vol. 48 no. 4 pp. 1125-1150
dc.identifier.issn1930-6237
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475450
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the effects of the ambiguous recognition of indigenous or “customary” law in Mexico on the struggle of indigenous women to ensure their rights are respected. After outlining the history of legal changes to recognize indigenous law, I analyze three paradigmatic cases: Eufrosina Cruz Mendoza and rights to political participation; Inés Fernández Ortega and Valentina Cantú and rights to physical security; and Nestora Salgado García and the criminalization of indigenous autonomies in a context of the spread of organized crime, revealing the Mexican government’s inconsistent approaches to recognizing indigenous peoples and women’s rights.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relationNYU Journal of International Law and Politics
dc.relation4
dc.relation.ispartofNYU Journal of International Law and Politics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNYU Journal of International Law and Politics vol. 48 no. 4
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/6388-legal-pluralism-and-indigenous-womens-rights-in
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectMexico
dc.titleLegal Pluralism And Indigenous Women’s Rights In Mexico: The Ambiguities Of Recognition
dc.typeJournal article
dc.typePeer reviewed


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel