• norsk
    • English
  • norsk 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Logg inn
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Chr. Michelsens Institutt
  • Publications
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Chr. Michelsens Institutt
  • Publications
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Proxy indicators for the corrupt misuse of corporations

Fazekas, Mihály; Tóth, Bence
Report
Thumbnail
Åpne
Proxy indicators for the corrupt misuse of corporations (2.437Mb)
Permanent lenke
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475436
Utgivelsesdato
2017-10-01
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Publications [1436]
Originalversjon
Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2017:6)  
Sammendrag
Winners of the U4 Proxy Challenge 2016

We need more imaginative ways of addressing corruption. It is important to generate indicators that development agencies can use. U4 and DFID developed a proxy challenge competition to inspire the research community to develop reliable, intuitive, accessible and cost-effective assessment methods that are useful across country-contexts.

The abuse of companies for corrupt purposes has reached the forefront of international anti-corruption efforts. However, we lack systematic evidence on which corporate characteristics are likely to signal corruption, and in which contexts. This can bias our understanding of corruption, making it overly focused on the public sector. Monitoring company age is a specific example of how we can validate indicators, tailored to context. We find company corruption risk indicators among three company characteristics: 1. Company registration, such as many companies on the same address 2. Financial information, such as extreme profitability, and 3. Ownership and management structures, such as hidden owners.

The abuse of companies for corrupt purposes has reached the forefront of international anti-corruption efforts. However, we lack systematic evidence on which corporate characteristics are likely to signal corruption, and in which contexts. This can bias our understanding of corruption, making it overly focused on the public sector. Monitoring company age is a specific example of how we can validate indicators, tailored to context. We find company corruption risk indicators among three company characteristics: 1. Company registration, such as many companies on the same address 2. Financial information, such as extreme profitability, and 3. Ownership and management structures, such as hidden owners.

How to measure company corruption risks

Recent scandals have brought to light the scale and diverse forms of abusing individual companies and extensive corporate networks for extracting cor
Utgiver
Chr. Michelsen Institute
Serie
U4 Brief 2017:6

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit
 

 

Bla i

Hele arkivetDelarkiv og samlingerUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifterDenne samlingenUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifter

Min side

Logg inn

Statistikk

Besøksstatistikk

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit