Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoehm, Frédéric
dc.contributor.authorSierra, Erika
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:22:05Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:22:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5610
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2015:9) 4 p
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475280
dc.description.abstractWhat supports the claim that corruption causes more suffering for women than men? By distinguishing between indirect victimisation and direct victimisation, it is reasonable to assume women suffer more, and differently, than men. A review of the scarce evidence on the direct impacts of corruption qualifies this claim to some extent. Nevertheless, a general reduction of gender inequalities can addresses the root causes of the gendered impacts of corruption. Anti-corruption programming should include an analysis of differences in gender exposure and vulnerability to corruption, while gender programmes would benefit from an anti-corruption lens.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2015:9
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2015:9
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5610-the-gendered-impact-of-corruption
dc.subjectPeople's Engagement
dc.titleThe gendered impact of corruption: Who suffers more? men or women?
dc.typeReport


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record