Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGianella, Camila
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:21:53Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:21:53Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:4129
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI Brief vol. 10 no. 7) 4 p.
dc.identifier.issn0809-6732
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475258
dc.description.abstractIs right-to-health litigation a suitable strategy for advancing the right to health, or does it reinforce inequalities and undermine health authorities in their attempts to control costs and set fair priorities? Colombia has the highest number of right-to-health cases in the world. Its experiences illustrate how judicial claims can reflect structural problems of a health system. It also shows how, by exercising oversight and holding governments to their promises and obligations, courts can provide policy makers with evidence to evaluate current policies and to discover structural problems.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationCMI Brief
dc.relation7
dc.relation.ispartofCMI Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Brief vol. 10 no. 7
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/4129-does-the-colombian-constitutional-court-undermine
dc.subjectColombia
dc.titleDoes the Colombian constitutional court undermine the health system?
dc.typeReport


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record