Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSundet, Geir
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:21:34Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:21:34Z
dc.date.issued2007-11-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:2812
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2007:14) 4 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475218
dc.description.abstractWhereas the successful application of PETS in Uganda has received and continues to receive a lot of attention, less has been written about the experiences of PETS elsewhere. The Tanzanian experience clearly shows that PETS is not a silver bullet as vested interests can easily derail the process.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2007:14
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2007:14
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/2812-public-expenditure-tracking-surveys
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectEnglish
dc.subjectCorruption
dc.subjectTanzania
dc.subjectPETS
dc.subjectPublic Financial Management and Procurement
dc.titlePublic Expenditure Tracking Surveys: Lessons from Tanzania
dc.typeReport


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record