Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Kavita Navlani
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:21:15Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:21:15Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5024
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI Brief vol. 12 no. 4, 2nd edition) 4 p.
dc.identifier.issn0809-6732
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475188
dc.description.abstractAt the time of independence, India used protective law to address fears that its tribal majority regions would be marginalized vis-a-vis the larger, more developed states of the new nation. The ‘Sixth Schedule’ was written into the Indian Constitution to ensure rights of self-government for the tribal majorities in North Eastern Himalayas. This brief explores the context of the Sixth Schedule and highlights the challenges to its effectiveness in the North Eastern state of Meghalaya. The aim is to discuss the complexity of the situation where a modern state tries to engage traditional tribal societies in the process of nation building.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationCMI Brief
dc.relation4
dc.relation.ispartofCMI Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Brief vol. 12 no. 4
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5024-tribal-marginalization-in-india
dc.subjectIndia
dc.titleTribal marginalization in India: Social exclusion and protective law
dc.typeReport


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record