Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOrre, Aslak
dc.contributor.authorPestana, Nelson
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:20:30Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:20:30Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5126
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (Angola Brief vol. 4 no. 6) 4 p.
dc.identifier.issn1892-3933
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475114
dc.description.abstractIs the Government once again going to delay local elections and democratic decentralisation? The 2010 Constitution renewed the Angolan state’s commitment to such a process, and the President of the Republic recently recognised the “unquestionable importance of institutionalising the autarquias in the current situation”. 1 Yet, the current Government discourse emphasises “gradualism” and that “the conditions have to be prepared”. Details of this reform – calendar, responsibilities, scope - are still unknown to the public. With pressure in society growing for the implementation of the autarquias, is reform any less urgent than when the Constitutions was written? We argue below that the basic challenges of local governance in Angola remain the same and that the autarquias can be a path to their solution – given there is political will for it.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationAngola Brief
dc.relation6
dc.relation.ispartofAngola Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAngola Brief vol. 4 no. 6
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5126-arguments-for-democratic-decentralisation-in
dc.subjectAngola
dc.titleArguments for democratic decentralisation in Angola: If challenges remain the same, why delay the autarquias?
dc.typeReport


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record