Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHelland, Johan
dc.contributor.authorMæstad, Ottar
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:20:22Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:20:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5567
dc.identifier.citationOslo: Norad (Evaluation Department Report no. 5) 28 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475102
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this report is to describe how the decisions to use results-based payments in Norwegian development cooperation were made and the considerations that formed the basis for these decisions. The report describes the political context and background for the decisions to use results-based payments in the health sector and in the climate and forestry and clean energy initiatives. It discusses the extent to which evidence was used to inform decisions and asks whether the advantages and disadvantages of results-based payments were compared to traditional funding modalities. Finally, it provides an overview of the theoretical basis for results-based payments as it has evolved and been applied in relation to the Norwegian initiatives.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNorad
dc.relationEvaluation Department Report
dc.relation5
dc.relation.ispartofEvaluation Department Report
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEvaluation Department Report 5
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5567-basis-for-decisions-to-use-results-based-payments
dc.titleBasis for Decisions to use Results-Based Payments in Norwegian Development Aid
dc.typeResearch report


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record