Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorZaum, Dominik
dc.contributor.authorJohnsøn, Jesper
dc.contributor.authorGippert, Birte
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:20:01Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:20:01Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5603
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2015:8) 6 p
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475060
dc.description.abstractFull text on mobile or tablet The New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States provides a framework in which donors and host countries establish shared priorities for reducing fragility, with fragile states themselves taking the lead. Despite critics' concerns, a preliminary analysis finds no negative effect on anti-corruption programming. However, the policy's potential for improving control of corruption remains largely unfulfilled. The main challenge is to go beyond technical responses to politically smart engagement. The New Deal provides more space for political dialogue than the Paris Declaration, but aid agencies need operational guidelines on how to develop programming and link technical and diplomatic responses to corruption concerns in fragile states.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2015:8
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2015:8
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5603-the-new-deal-as-an-anti-corruption-tool-don
dc.subjectFragile States
dc.titleThe New Deal as an anti-corruption tool? Don't blame the policy, work with it
dc.typeReport


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel