Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHoppe, Tilman
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:19:01Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:19:01Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-06
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5136
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2014:5) 4 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474942
dc.description.abstractAsset declarations serve in many countries as a tool for detecting and preventing illicit enrichment and conflicts of interests among public officials. However, not all countries with an asset declaration regime in place require members of the judiciary to make such declarations. A closer analysis shows that asset declaration regimes do not pose a significant risk to the independence and security of judges. On the contrary, the author finds that anti-corruption benefits provide strong reasons to require judges to file asset declarations along with other public officials.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2014:5
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2014:5
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5136-the-case-for-asset-declarations-in-the-judiciary
dc.subjectJustice
dc.titleThe case for asset declarations in the judiciary: Identifying illicit enrichment and conflicts of interests
dc.typeReport


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel