• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Chr. Michelsens Institutt
  • Publications
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Chr. Michelsens Institutt
  • Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The case for asset declarations in the judiciary: Identifying illicit enrichment and conflicts of interests

Hoppe, Tilman
Report
Thumbnail
View/Open
The case for asset declarations in the judiciary: Identifying illicit enrichment and conflicts of interests (582.3Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474942
Date
2014-05-06
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Publications [1300]
Original version
Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2014:5) 4 p.  
Abstract
Asset declarations serve in many countries as a tool for detecting and preventing illicit enrichment and conflicts of interests among public officials. However, not all countries with an asset declaration regime in place require members of the judiciary to make such declarations. A closer analysis shows that asset declaration regimes do not pose a significant risk to the independence and security of judges. On the contrary, the author finds that anti-corruption benefits provide strong reasons to require judges to file asset declarations along with other public officials.
Publisher
Chr. Michelsen Institute
Series
U4 Brief 2014:5

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit