Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkaar, Elin
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Godos, Jemima
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Cath
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:18:21Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:18:21Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5018
dc.identifier.citationPresented at: NOLAN, Oslo, Norway, 17th-19th November, 2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474862
dc.description.abstractWhy have some countries in Latin America over the last two decades shifted from widespread impunity for past human rights violations to the implementation of various forms of specific accountability measures, while others have not? This paper lays out an analytical and methodological framework which (1) provides a tool for documenting the shift from impunity to accountability on a country-by-country basis, and (2) provides a tool for assessing the relative achievements in accountability across countries. The empirical focus is on the timing, combination, and sequencing of four transitional justice mechanisms: truth commissions, trials, victims’ reparations, and amnesties.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5018-from-impunity-to-accountability-for-human-rights
dc.subjectTransitional Justice
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.titleFrom Impunity to Accountability for Human Rights Violations in Latin America: Towards an Analytical Framework
dc.typeConference object


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record