Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkaar, Elin
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Godos, Jemima
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Cath
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:18:20Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:18:20Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5034
dc.identifier.citationPresented at: ECPR, Bordeaux, France, 5th-7th September, 2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474859
dc.description.abstractWhy have some countries in Latin America over the last two decades shifted from widespread impunity for past human rights violations to the implementation of various forms of specific accountability measures, while others have not? This paper lays out an analytical and methodological framework which (1) provides a tool for documenting the shift from impunity to accountability on a country-by-country basis, and (2) provides a tool for assessing the relative achievements in accountability across countries. The empirical focus is on the timing, combination, and sequencing of four transitional justice mechanisms: truth commissions, trials, victims’ reparations, and amnesties. Although close attention is paid to the specific institutional and non-institutional context in which transitional justice plays out, this analytical framework does not pretend to explain exactly why the shift from impunity to accountability has come about.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5034-from-impunity-to-accountability-for-human-rights
dc.subjectHuman Rights
dc.subjectTransitional Justice
dc.subjectImpunity
dc.subjectAccountability
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.titleFrom Impunity to Accountability for Human Rights Violations in Latin America: Towards an Analytical Framework
dc.typeConference object


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record