Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHart, Liz
dc.contributor.authorTaxell, Nils
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:18:16Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:18:16Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-19
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:5002
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2013:10) 6 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474851
dc.description.abstractA comparison of U4 partner agencies’ anti-corruption strategies shows that while they take different shapes, their purpose, content and approach is similar. Emphasis is placed on safeguarding donor funds and guiding support for anti-corruption interventions. They also signal a commitment to anti-corruption within the agency, to their domestic audience and partner countries. To go beyond mere rhetoric, strategies need to be properly resourced. Mainstreaming anti-corruption through other strategies and guidelines can potentially create greater integration. Comprehensive anti-corruption strategies run the risk of being viewed as separate from an agency’s overall work. Balancing risk management and zero tolerance in agency strategies emerges as a central issue.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2013:10
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2013:10
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/5002-donor-anti-corruption-strategies
dc.subjectAid
dc.subjectDonors
dc.subjectAnti-Corruption Strategies
dc.subjectRisk Management
dc.subjectZero Tolerance
dc.titleDonor anti-corruption strategies: Learning from implementation
dc.typeReport


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel