Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnsøn, Jesper
dc.contributor.authorMason, Phil
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:18:05Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:18:05Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-30
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:4873
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2013:2) 6 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474831
dc.description.abstractPractitioners working in anti-corruption face perennial challenges in measuring changes in corruption levels and evaluating whether anti-corruption efforts are successful. These two challenges are linked but not inseparable. To make progress on the latter front, that is, evaluating whether anti-corruption efforts are having an impact, the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre and the UK Department for International Development are launching an exploration into the use of proxy indicators. Proxy indicators are alternatives to “direct” indicators that more directly measure the phenomenon under study but that may be hard to operationalize or require overly costly data collection. In the 2013 Proxy Challenge Competition, we invite academics and practitioners to present specific proposals for indicators that would be good proxy measures for anti-corruption results.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2013:2
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2013:2
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/4873-the-proxy-challenge
dc.subjectEvaluation Measurement
dc.titleThe Proxy Challenge: Why bespoke proxy indicators can help solve the anti-corruption measurement problem
dc.typeReport


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record