Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSchütte, Sofie Arjon
dc.contributor.authorButt, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:18:04Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-23
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:4903
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2013:5) 4 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474830
dc.description.abstractThe anti-corruption world has witnessed increasing institutional specialisation, including the emergence of anti-corruption courts. Indonesia’s Special Court for Corruption Crimes in Jakarta gained prominence for a nearly 100 per cent conviction rate from 2004 to 2011. However, after corruption courts were established in all provincial capitals in 2011, scandals and acquittals have raised questions and criticism about the courts’ integrity. While conviction and acquittal rates are popular proxies for court performance in Indonesia, they should not be used as stand-alone indicators. This case illustrates that institutional specialisation when rolled out to a larger scale must go in hand with broader judicial reform.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2013:5
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2013:5
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/4903-the-indonesian-court-for-corruption-crimes
dc.subjectJustice
dc.subjectIndonesia
dc.titleThe Indonesian Court for Corruption Crimes: Circumventing judicial impropriety?
dc.typeReport


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel