Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorde Vibe, Maja
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:17:19Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:17:19Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-12
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:4396
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Practice Insight no. 2012:1) 12 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474734
dc.description.abstractGiven the stagnating trend on corruption in Uganda and the need to consolidate accountability reforms ahead of the inflow of oil revenues, international development partners developed a Joint Response to Corruption in early 2009. The British Department for International Development (DFID) led an approach that draws on ideas from the OECD DAC Anti-Corruption Task Team, but was tailored to the local context. A year and a half later, the approach was showing promising results in terms of establishing a common platform for dialogue, improving the design of safeguards against corruption in other donor programmes, and encouraging anti-corruption allies in Uganda. The record is more mixed on the impact of sanctions, and sustainability of the donor effort remains a challenge. The Uganda experience suggests that an effective Joint Response to Corruption requires, among other things, investing in leadership for the initiative, building a strong base of evidence and analysis, and maintaining flexibility in order to seize opportunities to advance the anti-anticorruption agenda.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Practice Insight
dc.relation2012:1
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Practice Insight
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Practice Insight 2012:1
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/4396-a-joint-response-to-corruption-in-uganda
dc.subjectAid
dc.subjectUganda
dc.titleA joint response to corruption in Uganda: Donors beginning to bite?
dc.typeReport


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel