dc.contributor.author | de Vibe, Maja | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-04T08:17:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-04T08:17:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-03-12 | |
dc.identifier | oai:www.cmi.no:4396 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Practice Insight no. 2012:1) 12 p. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474734 | |
dc.description.abstract | Given the stagnating trend on corruption in Uganda and the need to consolidate accountability reforms ahead of the inflow of oil revenues, international development partners developed a Joint Response to Corruption in early 2009. The British Department for International Development (DFID) led an approach that draws on ideas from the OECD DAC Anti-Corruption Task Team, but was tailored to the local context. A year and a half later, the approach was showing promising results in terms of establishing a common platform for dialogue, improving the design of safeguards against corruption in other donor programmes, and encouraging anti-corruption allies in Uganda. The record is more mixed on the impact of sanctions, and sustainability of the donor effort remains a challenge. The Uganda experience suggests that an effective Joint Response to Corruption requires, among other things, investing in leadership for the initiative, building a strong base of evidence and analysis, and maintaining flexibility in order to seize opportunities to advance the anti-anticorruption agenda. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Chr. Michelsen Institute | |
dc.relation | U4 Practice Insight | |
dc.relation | 2012:1 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | U4 Practice Insight | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | U4 Practice Insight 2012:1 | |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.cmi.no/publications/4396-a-joint-response-to-corruption-in-uganda | |
dc.subject | Aid | |
dc.subject | Uganda | |
dc.title | A joint response to corruption in Uganda: Donors beginning to bite? | |
dc.type | Report | |