Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOrre, Aslak Jangård
dc.contributor.authorMathisen, Harald W.
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:16:22Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:16:22Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:3235
dc.identifier.citationCopenhagen: Danish Institute for International Affairs (DIIS Policy Brief - Fragile Situations) 4 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474621
dc.description.abstractPolicy recommendations: Confronting corruption is part and parcel of building legitimacy and public confidence in fragile states. Corruption creates instability and inefficiency. The tendencies to defer anti-corruption to “a later stage” therefore fail to ensure an essential component of stabilisation. A careful analysis of the political and social basis of corruption and potential drivers for change is essential. “Blueprints” of anti-corruption activities taken from other contexts could be harmful in fragile situations. Donor countries have a strong responsibility to safeguard their interventions (including business corporations and military operations) against corruption to avoid signalling tolerance for corruption.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherDanish Institute for International Affairs
dc.relationDIIS Policy Brief - Fragile Situations
dc.relation.ispartofDIIS Policy Brief - Fragile Situations
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDIIS Policy Brief - Fragile Situations
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/3235-corruption-in-fragile-states
dc.titleCorruption in Fragile States
dc.typeResearch report


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record