Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWalker, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T08:15:44Z
dc.date.available2018-01-04T08:15:44Z
dc.date.issued2009-03-26
dc.identifieroai:www.cmi.no:3327
dc.identifier.citationBergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2009:3) 4 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474533
dc.description.abstractHumanitarian crises that call for international assistance almost always take place in countries that either can’t or won’t meet the needs of their population at risk. Vulnerable environments, poverty, and poor governance enable these crises. Given this reality, does humanitarian assistance actually increase corruption? How do aid workers and the populations they serve perceive the impact of corruption? Where and how is corruption most likely to occur? And finally, what do agencies do to reduce risk? This Brief summarises key findings from a set of studies investigating these questions, and offers some thoughts about how donors and implementing agencies could better address the challenges of corruption in the context of humanitarian action.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relationU4 Brief
dc.relation2009:3
dc.relation.ispartofU4 Brief
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU4 Brief 2009:3
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cmi.no/publications/3327-confronting-corruption-in-humanitarian-aid
dc.subjectHumanitarian Aid
dc.subjectCorruption
dc.subjectEmergencies
dc.subjectUSA
dc.subjectIran
dc.subjectSudan
dc.titleConfronting corruption in humanitarian aid: Perspectives and options
dc.typeReport


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel