Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVillanger, Espen
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-22T11:41:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T09:13:29Z
dc.date.available2008-02-22T11:41:45Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T09:13:29Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.isbn82-8062-051-6
dc.identifier.issn0804-3639
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2436154
dc.description.abstractDespite the importance attached to conditionality by the donors, and the fact that aid is a crucial income source for the recipient, it is found that conditionality fails. One explanation for this failure could be that a halt in aid could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may use contracts strategically to make companies influence the disbursement decision to avoid implementing the donors’ conditions. Failing to take account of the companies’ role yields the opposite result in this model, i.e., conditionality becomes successful.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Working paper
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP 2003: 5
dc.subjectTriadic
dc.subjectConditionality
dc.subjectForeign aid
dc.subjectForeign assistance
dc.subjectJEL classification: E61, F35
dc.titleCompany interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors out against each other
dc.typeWorking paper


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record