Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHatlebakk, Magnus
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-19T07:49:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T09:12:53Z
dc.date.available2008-02-19T07:49:35Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T09:12:53Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.isbn82-8062-145-8
dc.identifier.issn0804-3639
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2435957
dc.description.abstractWe study an effective intervention into a specific form of bonded labor. The intervention led to a shift in agrarian contracts, from bonded labor to sharecropping. By comparing the pre- and post-liberation contracts we evaluate theoretical models of agrarian contracts. We suggest three mechanisms that jointly explain why landlords offered bonded labor contracts pre-liberation. One mechanism we apply to define bonded labor in contrast to tied labor. The mechanism, where the outside option as casual labor is endogenously determined by the choice of long-term contract, implies a trade-off for the landlord between efficiency and redistribution of surplus.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Working paper
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP 2006: 6
dc.subjectTied labor
dc.subjectAgrarian institutions
dc.subjectNepal
dc.titleThe Effects on Agrarian Contracts of a Governmental Intervention into Bonded Labor in the Western Terai of Nepal
dc.typeWorking paper


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel