Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKolstad, Ivar
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-19T08:35:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T09:12:49Z
dc.date.available2008-02-19T08:35:20Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T09:12:49Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.isbn82-8062-154-7
dc.identifier.issn0804-3639
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2435944
dc.description.abstractThough corporate social responsibility (CSR) is on the agenda of most major corporations, corporate executives still largely support the view that corporations should maximize the returns to their owners. There are two lines of defence for this position. One is the Friedmanian view that maximizing owner returns is the corporate social responsibility of corporations. The other is a position voiced by many executives, that CSR and profits go together. This paper argues that the first position is ethically untenable, while the latter is not supported by empirical evidence. The implication is that there may be good reason for firms to deviate from a maxim of profit maximization.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Working paper
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP 2006: 11
dc.subjectProfit maximization
dc.subjectBusiness ethics
dc.subjectCorporate social responsibility
dc.subjectJEL codes: D63, M14
dc.titleWhy firms should not always maximize profits
dc.typeWorking paper


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record