Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkaar, Elin
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-12T09:42:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T09:12:22Z
dc.date.available2008-03-12T09:42:34Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T09:12:22Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.issn0805-505X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2435818
dc.description.abstractThis comparative analysis of recent transitions to democracy in Argentina and Chile examines (1) the impact of the type of transition on democratic consolidation; (2) how resolving the problem of past human rights violations has influenced civil-military relations and democratic stability; and (3) what has been the role of human rights NGOs, the Catholic Church, andd political parties. A major conclusion is that state-civil society linkages are important to understanding demodratic transition and consolidation and that these linkages have unfortunately been deemphasised in much recent transition theory. Elin Skaar is a junior professional officer with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Namibia. She was affiliated to the CMI preparing her MA dissertation on the transition to democracy in Argentina and Chile.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch report
dc.relation.ispartofseriesR 1994: 5
dc.subjectHuman rights
dc.subjectDemocratization
dc.subjectChile
dc.subjectArgentina
dc.titleHuman Rights Violations and the Paradox of Democratic Transition. A Study of Chile and Argentina
dc.typeResearch report


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel