Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGloppen, Siri
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-25T12:42:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T09:12:17Z
dc.date.available2008-02-25T12:42:50Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T09:12:17Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.isbn82-8062-011-7
dc.identifier.issn0805-505X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2435792
dc.description.abstractThe report presents an overview of institutional strategies to deal with the problem of past atrocities – trials, purges, truth commissions, restorative efforts, reforms, amnesty and amnesia. It discusses the main debates and dilemmas raised by these efforts, as reflected in the transitional justice literature. A central lesson drawn is that local ownership and legitimacy for the process is crucial for reconciliation to result. This, in turn, is to a large extent a function of the process through which the transitional justice institutions are established. It is in other words, not only a matter of what is done and when, but how and by whom.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch report
dc.relation.ispartofseriesR 2002: 5
dc.subjectDemocratisation
dc.subjectTransition justice
dc.subjectTruth commissions
dc.subjectWar crimes
dc.subjectPeace-building
dc.subjectUnited Nations
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.titleReconciliation and Democratisation: Outlining the Research Field
dc.typeResearch report


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel