Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorOfstad, Arve
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-28T07:29:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T09:12:08Z
dc.date.available2008-02-28T07:29:06Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T09:12:08Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.isbn82-90584-79-2
dc.identifier.issn0804-3639
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2435754
dc.description.abstractIn countries with an ongoing violent conflict aid donors are confronted by four sets of issues: How the volume and orientation of the program may influence a peace process; whether development efforts may be undertaken in rebel controlled territories; and how an early rehabilitation program may affect the long term process. In this article we analyze the strategies applied in Sri Lanka by donors applying a traditional development approach and those following a more comprehensive approach. Dilemmas are created vis-à-vis both the governments and the rebels' policies and interests. Four general conclusions underline the political nature of development aid programs during a violent conflict.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Working paper
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP 2000: 18
dc.subjectAid policy
dc.subjectConflicts
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectSri Lanka
dc.titleCountries in violent conflict and aid strategies: The case of Sri Lanka
dc.typeWorking paper


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel