Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTostensen, Arne
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-25T10:13:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T09:12:02Z
dc.date.available2008-02-25T10:13:43Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T09:12:02Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.isbn82-8062-027-3
dc.identifier.issn0804-3639
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2435730
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the extent to which the poverty-reduction strategies of selected multilateral and bilateral donors incorporate an urban poverty dimension. Key policy documents of multilaterals such as the World Bank, the UNDP, Habitat and IFAD are scrutinised, as well as those of two bilateral agencies: DFID and Sida. It appears that urban poverty has moved up on the policy agenda of many agencies but notions of ‘urban bias’ still linger in the analyses of some. It is particularly noteworthy that the persistent and widespread urban-rural linkages are given inadequate attention in virtually all policy documents, with potentially serious consequences for aid interventions.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChr. Michelsen Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCMI Working paper
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP 2002: 5
dc.subjectUrbanisation
dc.subjectUrban poverty
dc.subjectPoverty reduction
dc.subjectDonors
dc.titleUrban Dimensions of Donors' Poverty-Reduction Strategies
dc.typeWorking paper


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record